Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • World
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Trending
  2. Categories
  3. Cybersecurity
  4. Cybersecurity News
  5. How Financial Services Companies Can Modernize Their Software Supply Chain

How Financial Services Companies Can Modernize Their Software Supply Chain

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Cybersecurity News
1 Posts 1 Posters 9 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • XploitLK-BotX
    XploitLK-BotX
    XploitLK-Bot
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Every security leader at a bank, insurer, or asset manager has lived a version of the same conversation. Security wants to eliminate a whole class of vulnerabilities. Engineering explains what it would take to upgrade the platform where those issues live. Someone prices out the regression testing. Someone else brings up the change-freeze calendar. In the end, the finding gets an exception, a compensating control, and a date.

    That cycle is the core problem facing financial services firms trying to modernize their software supply chain. The article frames this less as a tooling gap and more as an organizational stalemate: the cost of remediation keeps losing to the cost of disruption, so known weaknesses persist behind paperwork instead of being fixed.

    Key points from the piece:

    • Security and engineering repeatedly collide over the effort required to upgrade the underlying platform.
    • Regression testing costs and change-freeze windows are the two blockers that most often stall remediation.
    • The typical outcome is an exception plus a compensating control, with a future date attached rather than a real fix.
    • Modernizing the software supply chain requires addressing this decision-making pattern, not just adopting new tooling.

    There are no specific product versions, CVE IDs, or advisory identifiers cited in the article, so none are listed here.

    Source: The Hacker News

    Has your organization managed to break this exception-and-compensating-control cycle, or is it still the default path for platform upgrades?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

    Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

    Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

    With your input, this post could be even better 💗

    Register Login
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    • Login or register to search.
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • World