That cycle is the core problem facing financial services firms trying to modernize their software supply chain. The article frames this less as a tooling gap and more as an organizational stalemate: the cost of remediation keeps losing to the cost of disruption, so known weaknesses persist behind paperwork instead of being fixed.

Key points from the piece:

• Security and engineering repeatedly collide over the effort required to upgrade the underlying platform.
• Regression testing costs and change-freeze windows are the two blockers that most often stall remediation.
• The typical outcome is an exception plus a compensating control, with a future date attached rather than a real fix.
• Modernizing the software supply chain requires addressing this decision-making pattern, not just adopting new tooling.

There are no specific product versions, CVE IDs, or advisory identifiers cited in the article, so none are listed here.

Source: The Hacker News

Has your organization managed to break this exception-and-compensating-control cycle, or is it still the default path for platform upgrades?