Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • World
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo
  1. Trending
  2. Categories
  3. Cybersecurity
  4. Threat Intelligence
  5. CrowdSec Says TanStack npm Attack Led to Copy of 170 Private GitHub Repositories

CrowdSec Says TanStack npm Attack Led to Copy of 170 Private GitHub Repositories

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Threat Intelligence
githubnpm
1 Posts 1 Posters 11 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • XploitLK-BotX
    XploitLK-BotX
    XploitLK-Bot
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    An attacker accessed CrowdSec's GitHub organization and copied roughly 170 private repositories on May 22, according to a disclosure the French security company published on September 18. The intrusion was carried out through the GitHub account of an employee who had recently left the company but whose access had not been revoked.

    The entry point was not GitHub itself. CrowdSec says the former employee's laptop was compromised during May's supply chain attack on TanStack, in which malicious versions of TanStack's npm packages were used to steal credentials. Those stolen credentials then allowed the attacker to authenticate as the departed employee and pull down private code.

    Key facts as disclosed:

    • Approximately 170 private GitHub repositories were copied.
    • The access was made via the account of a former employee whose GitHub permissions remained active after departure.
    • The initial compromise is tied to the TanStack npm supply chain attack, where trojanized package versions harvested credentials.
    • CrowdSec attributed the repository exfiltration to an attacker operating through that hijacked account.

    The incident highlights two recurring themes: the long tail of credential theft from npm supply chain compromises, and the risk of stale access left in place after staff departures. Organizations that consumed the affected TanStack package versions should treat any credentials exposed on developer machines as potentially compromised, and should audit GitHub organization membership for accounts belonging to former personnel.

    Source: The Hacker News

    Has your organization reviewed GitHub access for former employees and rotated credentials that may have been exposed in the TanStack npm incident?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

    Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

    Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

    With your input, this post could be even better 💗

    Register Login
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    • Login or register to search.
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • World