<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[FakeGit malware campaign returns with 17,610 malicious GitHub repos]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The <strong>FakeGit</strong> campaign has resurfaced, with researchers identifying <strong>17,610</strong> malicious repositories on <strong>GitHub</strong> distributing the <strong>SmartLoader</strong> malware. The operation reactivated earlier this month after a period of inactivity, now primarily pushing the <strong>StealC</strong> infostealer as its final payload.</p>
<p dir="auto">The attack chain typically begins when a user downloads and executes a malicious file from one of the fake repositories. <strong>SmartLoader</strong> then acts as a loader, retrieving and deploying <strong>StealC</strong>, which is designed to harvest credentials, cryptocurrency wallets, and other sensitive data from compromised systems.</p>
<p dir="auto">Key points:</p>
<ul>
<li>Over <strong>17,000</strong> fake repositories identified on <strong>GitHub</strong></li>
<li><strong>SmartLoader</strong> serves as the initial payload and loader</li>
<li><strong>StealC</strong> infostealer is the primary final-stage malware</li>
<li>The campaign reactivated earlier this month after a dormant period</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto">Users and organizations should exercise caution when downloading code or executables from unfamiliar <strong>GitHub</strong> repositories, even if they appear legitimate. Verifying repository ownership, checking commit history, and scanning downloaded files before execution are recommended precautions.</p>
<p dir="auto">Source: <a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/fakegit-malware-campaign-returns-with-17-610-malicious-github-repos" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">Publication Name</a></p>
<p dir="auto">Has anyone in the community encountered suspicious repositories matching this pattern, and what steps is your organization taking to vet third-party code from platforms like GitHub?</p>
]]></description><link>https://xploitlk.com/topic/615/fakegit-malware-campaign-returns-with-17-610-malicious-github-repos</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 07:48:44 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://xploitlk.com/topic/615.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 18:30:27 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>